No. Absolutely not. I think that that is an outdated, increasingly invalid, soon to be completely useless paradigm. Want examples? Look around. Who’s controlling either the C19 -or- BLM narrative? No one. Lots of effort, everyone’s failing miserably. I’m much more concerned with what I see as the current dominant trend, where people shop for the “information” that they -want- to receive, which of course someone provides for them, because there is money etc. to be had, which becomes to that person absolute incontrovertible truth, since it’s what they wanted to hear, and all else is “lies”, and “conspiracy”, etc. And so for instance people end up getting their medical advice from, oh FFS I’m so sick of Trump, how about Jenny fucking McCarthy. Great tits back in the day, knows fucking NOTHING about medicine. And so now kids die from measles again. Or were. Now everyone wants to believe in vaccines again.
Who controls -your- information, T? I’ll give you a hint, in the form of a question, which I’ve already asked you, to no response: “Media elites” You come up with that yourself, or did someone do it for you? Maybe even tell you to say that? See it on a list of “talking points” maybe…?
Oh sure. It’s happening right now. To you. See above. I mean, we basically have these discussions because we have differing viewpoints in these areas… so do you mean to imply that because of control of information, -my- viewpoint represents “those in power”? What possible credible definition of “those in power” supports that?
Yah, I know. I was kinda turning it around and making a joke about it.
Absolutely not. Review my post, I didn’t say anything remotely suggesting that in any way, to the contrary in fact. I’ll just leave it at that, although there’s a great rant there too.
Well, always a pleasure T, have a good one!